Does it look good?
Does it taste good?
The latter often is overlooked if the former is REALLY good. But rarely is the former overlooked no matter how good it tastes.
When you are a professional advertising your business....
DO NOT post cakes that look like they were made two years ago. If these are real cakes, not show cakes, I wouldn't touch them. They don't look edible (and not in the "wow this is too pretty to eat" way). And even if they are show cakes....show cakes are the opportunity to REALLY shine because you're not constricted by "edible only" items.
No likes...not surprising...
Back to figurine girl....we discussed her commenter in the last post. However, what we had not yet discussed is she thinks the dies of this cake have little dolls on them.
This is a beautiful cake.
This cake is completely fondant covered.
Those figures are either: stenciled on the fondant, hand painted on the fondant, airbrushed on the fondant (again, stencil), or they're individual fondant figures that are on the sides.
While you can buy fondant silhouettes to add to your cake (or just hire a baker worth their salt to actually do the artwork)....they're not like plastic figurines like:
And speaking of the above toppers...who buys a "let's advertise we're pregnant on top of our cake even though that bride clearly isn't showing yet" toppers?
Better yet....
PUT EDWARD AND BELLA ON YOUR CAKE!
(in case you're not in the know, Twilight)
I also don't really get the trend of "dragging your groom" toppers. Why are you getting married if you're literally DRAGGING him to the alter? Isn't that quickest way to divorce?
Or the even more bizarre, reverse:
And the degrading:
Guess who wears the pants in this family? (Hah. Ugh..)
And borderline inappropriate:
And we've passed "borderline":
AND LAST BUT NOT LEAST
50 Shade of Grey, the wedding topper.
I kid you not. This comes up as a search result for "wedding cake topper."
Have a terrible cake to show?
Seen a weirder topper?
Share! Contact me below!
No comments:
Post a Comment